Other General Comments on the Rebuttable Presumption Pursuit of Lawful Pathways May be Improperly Used as Evidence Final Decision of Foreign Government is Undefined Concerns About Conditions and Asylum Process in Mexico Specifically Concerns About Conditions and Asylum Process in Third Countries Generally Concerns About Differential Treatment of Migrants Concerns About Length of Process and Documentation Provided by Third Countries 1951 Convention and 1967 Protocol Signatories Alone Insufficient Exception for Certain Failures To Pre-Schedule a Time and Place To Present at a POE 257 CBP One Technological Issues and Functionalityĭ. General Comments Regarding the CBP One App Concerns About the Exception for Scheduled Arrivals at Ports of Entry Proposed Exceptions for Migrants Facing Danger in Third Countries Victim of Severe Form of Trafficking in Persons Other Exceptionally Compelling Circumstances Imminent and Extreme Threat to Life and Safety General Feedback on the Rebuttable Presumption of Ineligibility Require Migrants To Wait in Mexico or Other Countries Further Expand Refugee Processing or Other Lawful Pathways Alternatives and Other General or Mixed Feedback Inconsistent With Actions of Other Countries and Harmful to Foreign Relations Encourages Migration by Sea or Other Dangerous Means Negative Impacts on the Workforce and Economy Concerns Regarding Confusion, Delays, Backlog, and Inefficiencies CBP Official, AO, and IJ Conduct and Training Concerns Regarding Access to Counsel, Unrepresented Applicants, and the Ability or Time To Obtain Evidence and Prepare General Due Process and Procedural Concerns Women, Domestic Violence Survivors, and LGBT Individuals Other Underserved or Vulnerable Populations Allegations of Discrimination on Race, Ethnicity, or Nationality Grounds Individuals With Mental Impairments and Associated Mental Competency Issues Negative Impacts and Discrimination Against Particular Groups Belief That the Rule Will Increase Smuggling or Trafficking Belief That the Rule Will Result in Denial of Valid Asylum Claims Ports of Entry Should Be Open to Anyone To Make an Asylum Claim Belief That the Rule Is Motivated by Unlawful Intent and Inconsistent With U.S. Concerns Related to Impacts on Asylum Seekers or Conflicts With Humanitarian Values Ineffective Because Exceptions Will Swallow the Rule Ineffective Without Changes to Withholding of Removal or CAT Adjudications Unnecessary Given Lack of Access to Asylum Unnecessary Given the Asylum Processing IFR Similarity to Actions of Past Administration Concerns Regarding the Sufficiency of the Lawful Pathways Positive Impacts on Operations and Resources Mitigate Irregular Migration and the Associated Impacts Need, Effectiveness, and Rationale for the Rule Clarification of Meaning of “Final Decision” Expansion of Applicability to Adjacent Coastal Borders Applicability of Rebuttable Presumption After the Two-Year Period Removing Provisions Implementing the Proclamation Bar IFR and the TCT Bar Final Rule This repetition of headings to form internal navigation links Headings within the legal text of Federal Register documents. This table of contents is a navigational tool, processed from the Provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts. Rendition of the daily Federal Register on does not Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML Legal research should verify their results against an official edition of The official SGML-based PDF version on, those relying on it for The material on is accurately displayed, consistent with ![]() While every effort has been made to ensure that Regulatory information on with the objective ofĮstablishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status.įor complete information about, and access to, our official publications Informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal This prototype edition of theĭaily Federal Register on will remain an unofficial ![]() Each document posted on the site includes a link to theĬorresponding official PDF file on. The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official It is not an official legal edition of the Federal ![]() This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the dailyįederal Register.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |